<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>feild scopes &#187; better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://feildscopes.com/tag/better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://feildscopes.com</link>
	<description>Long range optics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:40:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is longer or shorter focal length on a spotting scope better?</title>
		<link>http://feildscopes.com/is-longer-or-shorter-focal-length-on-a-spotting-scope-better/675/</link>
		<comments>http://feildscopes.com/is-longer-or-shorter-focal-length-on-a-spotting-scope-better/675/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 03:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[spotting scopes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[better]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[focal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[length]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[longer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shorter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spotting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feildscopes.com/is-longer-or-shorter-focal-length-on-a-spotting-scope-better/675/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m planning to buy a large spotting scope (100mm or larger). I&#8217;m looking at the various scopes from Meade and Celestron. It seems that for a given objective diameter, the Meade seems to have a longer focal length. Both companies offer telescope type interchangable eyepieces that offer different magnification. I&#8217;m actually trying to resolve a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m planning to buy a large spotting scope (100mm or larger). I&#8217;m looking at the various scopes from Meade and Celestron. It seems that for a given objective diameter, the Meade seems to have a longer focal length. Both companies offer telescope type interchangable eyepieces that offer different magnification. I&#8217;m actually trying to resolve a .3&#8243; (30 caliber) hole at 1,000 and a .22 bullet splatter on white metal (or paper hole) at 250 yards. Thinking about one of the 125mm Schmitt-Cassigrain scopes that will double as a low power telescope. So, higher or lower focal lengths allow for better resolution? And, how much does magnification has to do this, given equal diameter objectives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://feildscopes.com/is-longer-or-shorter-focal-length-on-a-spotting-scope-better/675/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which one is better, the Celestron Ultima 65 spotting scope or Barska Blackhawk 20-60X60 spotting scope?</title>
		<link>http://feildscopes.com/which-one-is-better-the-celestron-ultima-65-spotting-scope-or-barska-blackhawk-20-60x60-spotting-scope/631/</link>
		<comments>http://feildscopes.com/which-one-is-better-the-celestron-ultima-65-spotting-scope-or-barska-blackhawk-20-60x60-spotting-scope/631/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 04:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[spotting scopes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2060X60]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[better]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackhawk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celestron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spotting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ultima]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feildscopes.com/which-one-is-better-the-celestron-ultima-65-spotting-scope-or-barska-blackhawk-20-60x60-spotting-scope/631/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Celestron is 18-55&#215;60mm while the Barska Blackhawk is 20-60&#215;60mm.
I wish to know which one is better quality in optic performance.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Celestron is 18-55&#215;60mm while the Barska Blackhawk is 20-60&#215;60mm.<br />
I wish to know which one is better quality in optic performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://feildscopes.com/which-one-is-better-the-celestron-ultima-65-spotting-scope-or-barska-blackhawk-20-60x60-spotting-scope/631/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does a refractor spotting scope produce a better image than a catadioptric scope?</title>
		<link>http://feildscopes.com/does-a-refractor-spotting-scope-produce-a-better-image-than-a-catadioptric-scope/615/</link>
		<comments>http://feildscopes.com/does-a-refractor-spotting-scope-produce-a-better-image-than-a-catadioptric-scope/615/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 03:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[spotting scopes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[better]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catadioptric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[produce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spotting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[than]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feildscopes.com/does-a-refractor-spotting-scope-produce-a-better-image-than-a-catadioptric-scope/615/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://feildscopes.com/does-a-refractor-spotting-scope-produce-a-better-image-than-a-catadioptric-scope/615/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What do u think is better CS..Mech enginering..or Electrical enginer? ?</title>
		<link>http://feildscopes.com/what-do-u-think-is-better-cs-mech-enginering-or-electrical-enginer/543/</link>
		<comments>http://feildscopes.com/what-do-u-think-is-better-cs-mech-enginering-or-electrical-enginer/543/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 03:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[feild scopes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[better]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CS..Mech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electrical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enginer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enginering..or]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[think]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feildscopes.com/what-do-u-think-is-better-cs-mech-enginering-or-electrical-enginer/543/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey.. guyz..
If u have good knowledge or experience than i really need ur opinions..
I want to know .
Which is better ..Bachellors in Computer science.or mech engineering..or Electrical engineering..??What do u think?
Which feild has more monetary rewards..satisfaction..and relatively a good scope  in the future(4 or 5 years later)
Ps:thanks in advance..!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey.. guyz..</p>
<p>If u have good knowledge or experience than i really need ur opinions..</p>
<p>I want to know .<br />
Which is better ..Bachellors in Computer science.or mech engineering..or Electrical engineering..??What do u think?</p>
<p>Which feild has more monetary rewards..satisfaction..and relatively a good scope  in the future(4 or 5 years later)</p>
<p>Ps:thanks in advance..!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://feildscopes.com/what-do-u-think-is-better-cs-mech-enginering-or-electrical-enginer/543/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which feild is better for me,civil or computer engineering?</title>
		<link>http://feildscopes.com/which-feild-is-better-for-mecivil-or-computer-engineering/469/</link>
		<comments>http://feildscopes.com/which-feild-is-better-for-mecivil-or-computer-engineering/469/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 03:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[feild scopes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[better]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mecivil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feildscopes.com/which-feild-is-better-for-mecivil-or-computer-engineering/469/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do not have the subject idea and i donot have enough time to do higher studies. I want to do job+business. I am good at mathematics and i still can work hard to improve it but i need limited physics and chemistry.I have just 4 years to study because my father is working very [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not have the subject idea and i donot have enough time to do higher studies. I want to do job+business. I am good at mathematics and i still can work hard to improve it but i need limited physics and chemistry.I have just 4 years to study because my father is working very hard to earn and i want to give him relief as soon as possible.Please suggest me which engineering is faster to complete to do job+business and have better scopes in future,civil or computer engineering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://feildscopes.com/which-feild-is-better-for-mecivil-or-computer-engineering/469/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

